Cursor Session Tracking

Capture Cursor agent transcripts alongside Claude Code, Codex, and Grok work so teams can review prompts, edits, tool output, and unresolved loops in one evidence layer.

Request access Setup guide

// who it helps

Teams using Cursor for agent-assisted development across production repos.

// the painful moment

Why this matters

Cursor work can move quickly inside local projects, but the useful context often stays in local transcripts. Teams need a shared record of what was asked, what changed, what failed, and what still needs review.

What AgentPM captures

Cursor agent transcripts and local project context.
Prompts, replies, commands, edits, errors, and tool output when present in the session record.
Searchable session evidence connected to users, machines, directories, and repos.

What teams can do

Review Cursor-assisted work with the same evidence layer as other agents.
Recover decisions, failed attempts, and verification context from prior sessions.
Compare Cursor workflows with Claude Code, Codex, and Grok usage across the team.

Questions this answers

What did Cursor try before this change landed?
Which project or repo saw the most Cursor activity?
Where are Cursor sessions leaving repeated review or setup gaps?

// fit

What AgentPM is not replacing

AgentPM does not replace Cursor, Git, or code review. It preserves the session evidence around Cursor-assisted work so teams can inspect and improve it.

A typical workflow

01Install the local collector on machines where Cursor runs.
02Continue using Cursor in local projects.
03Search captured sessions and open notebook or insight views for review.
04Use patterns across sessions to improve prompts, docs, and rollout guidance.

// common questions

Questions about cursor session tracking

Does AgentPM work with Cursor?

Yes. AgentPM can collect supported Cursor session transcripts from local machines and route that evidence into the right organization for search, review, insights, and coaching.

Can AgentPM compare Cursor work with other agents?

Yes. AgentPM is built as a cross-agent evidence layer, so teams can inspect Cursor work alongside Claude Code, Codex, Grok, and other captured coding-agent sessions.

What is AgentPM?

AgentPM is an evidence layer for coding-agent work. It captures local agent sessions, makes them searchable, and helps teams understand what happened before work becomes a pull request, ticket, or review.

How is AgentPM different from LLM observability?

LLM observability usually tracks model calls, traces, cost, latency, and evals. AgentPM tracks engineering work: what agents attempted, where they got stuck, what changed, and what evidence explains the session.

Does AgentPM replace GitHub, Jira, or Linear?

No. AgentPM captures the work that happens before those systems have a clean artifact. It complements code hosts, issue trackers, and review tools with searchable session evidence.

// related

Related use cases

All use cases